Great post at John Baez's blog - http://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/our-galactic-environment/
Its very cool to have an even greater perspective on where we are and whats around us. Wasn't that long ago that our view barely extended to the solar planetary system, and now we visit its farthest reaches with spacecraft. How long before there is some kind of plan to explore this wider vista? Distance, duration, and speed limits will frame how the exploration will occur, and how we will come to understand it, but I bet it will occur.
Blogging for family, friends, and visitors, updated intermittently. A semi-permanent record. Mostly a photoblog but not entirely.
Monday, December 31, 2012
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Saturn
This is too cool!
From Cassini. Lots more details here: http://www.ciclops.org/view/7418/A_Splendor_Seldom_Seen?js=1
From Cassini. Lots more details here: http://www.ciclops.org/view/7418/A_Splendor_Seldom_Seen?js=1
sigh. foreseeable, lamentable, unintended consequences
Polio rates increasing in Central Asia. Heath workers distributing vaccines killed. Reason? Health workers used as cover by CIA trying to find OBL back in the day, leading to distrust now.
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/12/health-workers-killed-trying-deliver-polio-vaccine-pakistan/60100/
Map thanks to http://www.polioeradication.org/Dataandmonitoring.aspx
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/12/health-workers-killed-trying-deliver-polio-vaccine-pakistan/60100/
Map thanks to http://www.polioeradication.org/Dataandmonitoring.aspx
Monday, December 17, 2012
Coupland is always good for interesting insight
I've always enjoyed Coupland's insight.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/a-radical-pessimists-guide-to-the-next-10-years/article1321040/
My read is that if Coupland is near the mark the future will be mundane, distressing when we think about missed opportunities, yet strangely comfortable. We'll see.
I think the applecart will be upset by something unusual, unexpected, unforeseen in its consequences. Detection of intelligence (maybe, it'll be ambiguous) in deep space, or the emergence of some kind of artificial intelligence here, or interesting results in bio-medial research that lead to significant life extension that no one is prepared for.
I hope we mature, at least a little bit.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/a-radical-pessimists-guide-to-the-next-10-years/article1321040/
My read is that if Coupland is near the mark the future will be mundane, distressing when we think about missed opportunities, yet strangely comfortable. We'll see.
I think the applecart will be upset by something unusual, unexpected, unforeseen in its consequences. Detection of intelligence (maybe, it'll be ambiguous) in deep space, or the emergence of some kind of artificial intelligence here, or interesting results in bio-medial research that lead to significant life extension that no one is prepared for.
I hope we mature, at least a little bit.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
patenting seeds?
Good overview article by Carey Gilliam in Reuters about an upcoming court case regarding seed patents.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/10/us-monsanto-lawsuit-idUSBRE8B917T20121210
I'm all for protecting innovation, but I'm not so much for using the patent system to leverage innovation protection into non-competitive market dominance or oppression. There are real policy issues: food policy, farm policy, food safety, as well as intellectual property policy. I hope the path forward incorporates all the considerations that affect the economic health of society, and not just considerations of intellectual property maximization designed to benefit the incumbent biggest corporations. Just sayin'
Thanks to the interwebs for a photo of seeds.
Monday, December 03, 2012
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
Wednesday, September 05, 2012
economic basics - observations from Ian Welsh
In particular, one caught my eye. This observation illuminates an extremely effective oligarchy-enhancing policy mechanism:
For Ian's full post, see: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/09/some-basics-on-the-economy.html Warning: kinda sobering.
Austerity is a means by which the rich can buy up assets which are not normally on the market for cheap.
For Ian's full post, see: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/09/some-basics-on-the-economy.html Warning: kinda sobering.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Monday, August 13, 2012
Wednesday, August 08, 2012
Mars
It is so cool to be able to post photos from Mars. So cool.
From: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/multimedia/pia16013.html
From: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/multimedia/pia16013.html
Tuesday, August 07, 2012
NASA Curiosity is awesome!
Congrats to NASA and the Mars Science Laboratory (aka Curiosity) team. Great job so far. This is inspiring. And to be able to see it as it descends! Thanks to Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter for that extra dose of awesome.
A few thoughts about the Olympics, Cord Cutting and #nbcfail
I've been trying to parse out some of the different factors in the #nbcfail discussion on Twitter and in other public forums. As an experimenting cord-cutter, of course I'm interested in streamed content that appeals to my family and I. Lets be clear, we're happy to pay for it, we're not looking to free-ride.
warning, perhaps tl;dr-ish
Seems like NBC is not just here to bring the Olympics to an interested audience, it needs to leverage the Olympics to earn a return on its significant payment for the rights. And they do this by bringing a mass audience to global brands for lucrative advertising. We're the product.
Internet streaming without tape-delay surely fragments the audience, reducing its size and impacting the magnitude of advertising sales. Also, NBC is owned by a cable provider, which probably sees unbundled internet streaming as a threat to its legacy cable cash-cow. Tying live internet streaming to the requirement that I have a cable subscription seems like buggy-whip manufacturers requiring automobile purchasers to also buy a big box of buggy-whips. But I suspect that the more the cable providers can convince people that internet access is just an add-on feature to cable the longer they can hang on to their legacy cash-cow business. However it seems that inexorably the technology is marching in the direction of content provisioning directly over internet. I suppose the cable vendors will fight this, but the cost advantages of the new technology may be difficult to fend off forever.
Seems to me the requirements of delivering a mass audience suitably prepared for a advertising consumption experience requires over production, and elimination of tidbits that might discomfort the audience and impact their advertising experience, thus: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/28/nbc-victims-tribute_n_1713527.html
Which is why the following is a surprise: http://globalgrind.com/news/nbc-apologizes-airing-monkey-gymnastics-commercial-after-gabby-douglas-win-details How did that slip through the sanitizing cracks?
Anyway, the average jamoke looking to watch the athletes and events he is interested in real time using the awesome power of the intertubes is not the target market here. As a result, his experience isn't optimized. I think I'll go watch more of the Curiosity coverage, thanks, that seems plenty authentic.
warning, perhaps tl;dr-ish
Seems like NBC is not just here to bring the Olympics to an interested audience, it needs to leverage the Olympics to earn a return on its significant payment for the rights. And they do this by bringing a mass audience to global brands for lucrative advertising. We're the product.
Internet streaming without tape-delay surely fragments the audience, reducing its size and impacting the magnitude of advertising sales. Also, NBC is owned by a cable provider, which probably sees unbundled internet streaming as a threat to its legacy cable cash-cow. Tying live internet streaming to the requirement that I have a cable subscription seems like buggy-whip manufacturers requiring automobile purchasers to also buy a big box of buggy-whips. But I suspect that the more the cable providers can convince people that internet access is just an add-on feature to cable the longer they can hang on to their legacy cash-cow business. However it seems that inexorably the technology is marching in the direction of content provisioning directly over internet. I suppose the cable vendors will fight this, but the cost advantages of the new technology may be difficult to fend off forever.
(Note: Any wonder we should be worried about mega-bundling: http://technicallybca.wordpress.com/2012/05/01/comcastverizon-soon-to-offer-4-play-deals/)
Seems to me the requirements of delivering a mass audience suitably prepared for a advertising consumption experience requires over production, and elimination of tidbits that might discomfort the audience and impact their advertising experience, thus: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/28/nbc-victims-tribute_n_1713527.html
Which is why the following is a surprise: http://globalgrind.com/news/nbc-apologizes-airing-monkey-gymnastics-commercial-after-gabby-douglas-win-details How did that slip through the sanitizing cracks?
Anyway, the average jamoke looking to watch the athletes and events he is interested in real time using the awesome power of the intertubes is not the target market here. As a result, his experience isn't optimized. I think I'll go watch more of the Curiosity coverage, thanks, that seems plenty authentic.
Monday, August 06, 2012
Sunday, July 15, 2012
buying your laws - oligarchy
So this might be an example of how large corporations buy favorable laws & regulations through campaign contributions, lobbying efforts, etc... http://www.alternet.org/food/156195
Partially related: http://boingboing.net/2012/06/13/meritocracies-become-oligarchi.html
I could have said that we've decided that the people who are the best at making money must obviously also be the best at all other activities, like governing or setting policy, or maybe heart-surgery or philosophy. But really, its just that the aggregation of great wealth has become so concentrated wealth-holders have unprecedented mechanisms for re-shaping society into forms that solely benefit further wealth consolidation. Its ironic that at a time in history when we have, also, unprecedented mechanisms for broadening democracy and citizenship, we've decided instead to build a class of wealth those in the Gilded Age could have imagined only with envy.
Partially related: http://boingboing.net/2012/06/13/meritocracies-become-oligarchi.html
I could have said that we've decided that the people who are the best at making money must obviously also be the best at all other activities, like governing or setting policy, or maybe heart-surgery or philosophy. But really, its just that the aggregation of great wealth has become so concentrated wealth-holders have unprecedented mechanisms for re-shaping society into forms that solely benefit further wealth consolidation. Its ironic that at a time in history when we have, also, unprecedented mechanisms for broadening democracy and citizenship, we've decided instead to build a class of wealth those in the Gilded Age could have imagined only with envy.
Tuesday, July 03, 2012
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Sunday, June 03, 2012
regulatory capture
I keep looking for well-articulated insight that captures the frequently distressing 21st century zeitgeist. Here is a quote from a New York Review of Books article by Zadie Smith:
article here: http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jun/02/north-west-london-blues/
"... complicit in this new, shared global reality in which states deregulate to privatize gain and re-regulate to nationalize loss."Takes the concept of "regulatory capture" to another level.
article here: http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/jun/02/north-west-london-blues/
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
SpaceX is Awesome!
Congratulations to Space X! Thanks to Wired for this writeup:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/05/spacexs-historic-rendezvous-with-the-space-station/
Seems to me there is a reasonable probability we won't see NASA leading manned missions to Mars, but I bet we get people there anyway, and sooner than I've feared. Thanks to the private sector. As it probably should be, for now at least. In my opinion. NASA has an extremely important and significant role to play, though, in infrastructure, funding, and related path clearing activities. Propellant depots anyone? Communication links..?
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/05/spacexs-historic-rendezvous-with-the-space-station/
Seems to me there is a reasonable probability we won't see NASA leading manned missions to Mars, but I bet we get people there anyway, and sooner than I've feared. Thanks to the private sector. As it probably should be, for now at least. In my opinion. NASA has an extremely important and significant role to play, though, in infrastructure, funding, and related path clearing activities. Propellant depots anyone? Communication links..?
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Tuesday, May 01, 2012
Kerouac on writing, per BrainPicker
I was a Kerouac fan from early on, and growing up not that far from Lowell added to my enthusiasm. But I never found this before, thanks much to Maria Popova @brainpicker. Its about writing, but its about a lot more than that, seems to me.
See: http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2012/03/22/jack-kerouac-belief-and-technique-for-modern-prose/
See: http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2012/03/22/jack-kerouac-belief-and-technique-for-modern-prose/
Thursday, March 15, 2012
the new monopolies
So, useful article online in Harpers. Killing the Competition: How the New Monopolies are Destroying Open Markets
I've been struggling for a while now trying to figure out how to articulate some of the issues I see with the current state of our economic system and free markets (to use the term loosely). This is is good thought piece and serves as one framework to understand some of the current impediments to growth. Sometimes it seems to me we're spending most of our national economic policy efforts in reconfiguring our society and culture into one large no-risk cash machine benefiting a relatively small number of large corporations.
This article also offers a sobering description of the impact on small companies of “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts” where, in my words, large companies can play small companies off against each other resulting in economic win-lose, not win-win scenarios. Disproportionally higher returns to larger aggregations of capital, I suppose one could say.
Money quote:
I've been struggling for a while now trying to figure out how to articulate some of the issues I see with the current state of our economic system and free markets (to use the term loosely). This is is good thought piece and serves as one framework to understand some of the current impediments to growth. Sometimes it seems to me we're spending most of our national economic policy efforts in reconfiguring our society and culture into one large no-risk cash machine benefiting a relatively small number of large corporations.
This article also offers a sobering description of the impact on small companies of “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts” where, in my words, large companies can play small companies off against each other resulting in economic win-lose, not win-win scenarios. Disproportionally higher returns to larger aggregations of capital, I suppose one could say.
Money quote:
Today, our overlords not only refuse to defend the power they hold—they deny that it is even possible for any American to accumulate such power. And to make such an absurd claim stick, they (or the more politically sophisticated of the academic economists in their employ) have undermined our language itself. Their most impressive act of lexical legerdemain was the coinage of various misnomers, some so audacious as to be worthy of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth. Corporate monopoly? Let’s just call that the “free market.” The political ravages of corporate power? Those could be recast as the essentially benign workings of “market forces.”
Friday, March 02, 2012
Thursday, March 01, 2012
Sunday, February 19, 2012
food/health
I've been trying to find a good way to say this. Andy Bellatti finds it for me, thanks to Wendell Berry.
Andy Bellatti MS, RD@andybellatti
"People fed by food industry, which pays no attention to health, & treated by health industry, which pays no attn to food." - Wendell Berry
Monday, January 16, 2012
celebrity
recently found via the web, a line of poetry that applies so frequently and poignantly, from Emily Dickinson:
Celebrity is the chastisement of merit and the punishment of talent.
Monday, January 09, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)